My friend and co-blogger, Julian, was kind enough to lend me the DVD Shortbus. He was very eager that the whole Blockhead team watch this so that we could discuss it at our next board meeting. I spent ninety or so minutes on it last night and found it extremely disappointing. It may be a good movie of its kind, but its certainly not my kind of movie.
What kind of movie is it? Truth in advertising is not, it appears, entirely a thing of the past. It says right on the cover "AN EXXXTREMELY ROMANTIC COMEDY," and though I was willing to give the cutesy misspelling a pass, the last two words, "romantic comedy" should have given me pause. Romantic comedies are right down there with "action" movies as my least favorite genres of cinema. Shortbus is, without a shadow of a doubt, a typical romantic comedy--with, to be sure, a twist. The twist is that all of the sex (gay and straight) that is supressed in standard romantic comedies is foregrounded here. The main character is a sex therapist (she prefers to be called a "couple counselor") who describes herself as "pre-orgasmic." She is, therefore, the typical romantic comedy heroine: a girl who has it all, almost, but has to look a little further to achieve the ultimate satisfaction which she is certain she deserves. There's a gay couple, one of whom loves too much, the other of whom is incapable of being loved at all thanks to a rock-bottom self image.
Oprah territory is not a place where I like to spend a lot of time, but it's clear that that's where we are.
Except that in an Oprah novel or movie much of the action would probably not be set in a sex club as is the case with Shortbus. Thus our main characters wander around the salon (based on Plato's Retreat?) and we're given shots of people of all ages, shapes, and colors joyfully engaged in all manner of sexual activity (with--and this is a refreshing change--the emphasis given to gay sex: there are a lot more dicks on display than pussies). The joy with which the Shortbus
extras go at it is--and this is surprising in a movie which, I think, is intended to be sex-positive--markedly in contrast to the glum coupling to which the main characters, due to their various complexes, seem to be resigned.
If one knows how romantic comedies work, one will not be surprised to find that, just as wedding bells will ring at the end of a Jane Austen novel, at movie's end the sex therapist comes (or should I write "cums"?), the depressed homosexual manages to open himself up--in more ways than one--to love, and the dominatrix . . . oh, I haven't mentioned the dominatrix. That's because the film-maker seems to lose interest in her halfway through. Her story (she "can't do this any more." She wants "a house and a cat she can pet") is simply allowed to flicker out at the end of the film with no resolution at all.
The acting is uniformly good (special kudos to Justin Bond playing himself), the new-agey therapy-speak the counselor and her husband use with each other is suitably ridiculous, and the dialog is often witty.
None of these, alas, save the film for me.
Julian: please tell me what I'm missing in this film which, I think, excited you--no, not that way!--more than it did me.
—David
Comments