One reason for a movie review is to help you decide if you want to see a movie or not. But without spoiling the experience by giving too much away. After a two-movie weekend, I do my best to fulfill the remit below.
2012 (Just opened in theaters worldwide)
Buckle up for a tsunami of disaster-movie clichés and jaw-dropping special effects. It’s hokey and overlong, but it does the job of thrilling and amazing and then some. For a three-minute version see the preview, which has most of the money shots. (3 stars out of 5). You’ll like it if you like: mindless thrills. Inglourious Basterds (Just opened in Japan; US/UK DVD due in December)
WWII as spaghetti western. It’s overscripted, underedited and gory as all get out. Although the movie is often charmingly weird, my interest was eventually nullified by cruelty, silliness and length. (0 stars out of 5). You’ll like it if you like: Tarantino movies.
--Julian
[いいですね] You may want to see:
http://www.alternet.org/story/144202/disney_apocalypse%3A_why_2012_sucks?page=entire
D
Posted by: Only a Blockhead | 11/30/2009 at 07:28 PM
Thanks for pointing me to that AlterNet article. For the writer, the dumbness of the film negated the thrills. And because the thrills are the whole point of 2012, he was bound to feel that the movie sucked.
The Tarantino movie sucked for me: the point of that film is clever dialog and movie references, and the thrills of gore and revenge. A lot of people love that stuff, so I didn’t say that Tarantino movies suck per se. They don’t. They just do for me. And I don’t want to write an article about why I think Tarantino movies suck, because the problem is me—I don’t get them--, not his movies.
The premise, characters and story in disaster movies like 2012 are just a coat hanger for the thrills. We don’t go to the movie to see the world ending: we go to see the world ending right behind the hero’s plane/car/RV! And to be amazed by extraordinary sights like --spoilers you see in the preview-- the dome of St Peters crashing down on the faithful, and an aircraft carrier being swept upside down onto the White House! Believe me, that… stuff… was… awesome!! I think I’m right in saying that those who left the theater satisfied weren't relieved that some of the characters survived, or fearful that that stuff might really happen in a couple of years. We just had the buzz of having had hearts delivered to mouths by envelope-pushing special effects.
The author of the AlterNet article calls the special effect thrills “Big Macs of empty visual calories.” My name is Julian and I’m a junk-movie junkie… but Perils-of-Pauline-, not Tarantino-style.
Posted by: Only a Blockhead | 12/01/2009 at 12:19 PM