I was perhaps too aggressive in championing Love, Nina yesterday. I took it on a trip with friends to Ome, a far-flung city lying between Tokyo and the mountains. (We explore a different historic area once a month.) Ome markets itself as a Showa era (mid 20th century) town, and is indeed a joy to walk around, but its most spectacular asset is out of sight a short walk south of the station. The Tama River makes a lazy arc at the bottom of wooded cliffs, with islands and shallows and shingle flats; a bucolic idyll of great beauty.
Waiting for the train home, I picked a letter from Love, Nina to read aloud. I enjoyed it so much I didn’t pay particular attention to its effect on my audience.
Me: Shall I read another one.
M: No, I’d rather read them myself. I’m not a good listener.
Me: I’m not a good reader.
M: It takes energy to listen.
(pause)
Me (a bit miffed): No audio books for you then.
M (a bit miffed): Apparently.
But who needs second-hand Nina-isms when we seem to be coming up with our own. Perhaps she has sensitized me to the details of conversation. We were discussing the rail route to next month’s destination: Kawagoe.
S: You can get there from here.
M: Really?
(We pore over the route maps on a platform signboard: intersecting lines going here and there.)
M: To get there from Hachioji, you can change at Tachikawa, or here at Haijima.
Me: It’s complicated.
M (who lives nearby): No, it isn’t. It’s just hard to understand.
--Julian
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.