All of the many reviews I wrote for the long defunct Asahi Evening News disappeared from the web not long after the paper disappeared from the world. Occasionally, though, I come across one of those reviews pasted into a mailing list or a blog. Here's one I wrote back in 2002 that I stumbled upon today:
Asahi Shimbun
01 March 2002
REVIEWS: You must take the `J' train
By DAVID COZY, Special to The Asahi Shimbun
BLUE NIPPON: Authenticating Jazz in Japan. By E. Taylor Atkins. ISBN:
0-8223-2721-X. U.S.: Duke University Press. 366 pp. $21.95.
As E. Taylor Atkins notes in his excellent study ``Blue Nippon,'' the
history of jazz in the world is only slightly longer than the history of
jazz in Japan. Thus one who tries to chronicle that history needn't worry
about a lack of subject matter. Rather, confronted with a superabundance of
material, the historian of jazz in Japan must find a way to choose
intelligently from the clutter, to decide what is irrelevant and what is
essential to the story. Atkins handles this difficulty by identifying a
handful of threads that run through the history of jazz from its earliest
days in the archipelago to the present, allowing these threads to guide him
through the tangled skein of incidents.
Foremost among the strands Atkins takes hold of is the concept of
``authentication'': how does one determine-and who has the authority to
determine-which arrangements of sounds qualify as ``real jazz''? As worries
about authenticity have also bedeviled white musicians in the United States,
and because Japanese musicians are even farther from the African-American
culture now understood to be the center of the jazz world, one sees why
Atkins settled on authentication as the issue to drive his study. Further,
since what counts as authentic changes year by year, it is a useful lens
through which to look at the changing roles jazz has played in Japanese
society.
Though we would now consider musicians such as Louis Armstrong, King Oliver
and Jelly Roll Morton central to any definition of authentic jazz, Atkins
reports that ``in their personal accounts virtually none of the early
Japanese musicians cites [them] as influences.'' Rather, the ``symphonic
jazz'' that the appropriately named Paul Whiteman played was the ideal
Japanese musicians most often emulated. Symphonic jazz, music from which
``exaggerated syncopation, `unmusical sonorities' and improvisation were
eliminated,'' would not, by today's standards, be considered jazz, but in
the 1920s Japan wasn't alone in its preference for ``Whiteman and white
men.'' As Atkins notes, not until the 1930s did European critics begin to
recognize the achievements of African-American artists, and the Japanese
jazz community might have followed suit. History, however, got in the way.
During the 1930s, jazz was enormously popular in Japan, particularly in
dance halls, which thrived in spite of attempts to regulate or close them.
Indeed, so popular was jazz that even in the face of the nationalism and
nativism that came to the fore during these years, it remained part of the
Japanese musical scene. More surprising, jazz was not suppressed in Japan
even during the darkest years of World War II: it was simply too popular to
entirely eliminate.
It was not popularity alone, however, which kept jazz from being crushed by
the militarist juggernaut. The Japanese jazz community helped assure its
continued existence by joining in with the ethos of the times and shifting
the then prevailing notion of what it meant to be authentic away from
American models and toward efforts to create a jazz that was authentically
Japanese. Though much later, a few efforts of this sort would meet with some
success, during the war years attempts to create ``Japanese jazz'' were
generally no more than the ``jazzing'' of Japanese folk songs, or patriotic
songs done in the style then considered jazzy. The exception to these
trivial attempts was, Atkins informs us, the music of Koichi Sugii, which,
he says, ``holds up brilliantly to contemporary standards of jazz
performance.''
One is grateful to Atkins for making us aware of musicians we may otherwise
have missed.
Jazz in America did not, while Japanese musicians were engaged in creating
acceptably Japanese jazz, sit still. Indeed the war years and the decade or
two that followed them, the years of Coltrane and Monk, Miles and Mingus,
were nothing less than a golden age of experiment and innovation. Japanese
musicians spent the years following World War II doing their best to
understand what these masters were up to and to imitate them.
There are, of course, problems with this approach. As Atkins puts it, the
Japanese jazz community was ``in the teleological conundrum of having its
artistic future mapped out by others: its aesthetic was referential; its art
was quite deliberately derivative and its customs contrived; its faith in
its own creative powers was too often obscured by its infatuation with
American examples.'' Most Japanese musicians were not, that is, committed to
``exploration of the unknown and the unprecedented,'' a commitment that many
would argue is necessary to the creation of jazz that is authentic.
Japanese musicians, of course, recognized this dilemma and attempted to deal
with it. Atkins' discussion of some of these artists, musicians who have
indeed explored the unknown and the unprecedented, is excellent. As these
aesthetic adventurers get essentially no attention from the media, we must
thank Atkins for making us aware of artists such as bassist Hideto Kanai and
guitarist Masayuki Takayanagi, musicians as interested in the work of John
Cage as they are in the work of John Coltrane and who are truly committed to
doing something new. Alas we must also join him in deploring the fact that
most of their recorded work is unavailable, and console ourselves instead
with the excellent record of their work and the work of others that Atkins
has given us in ``Blue Nippon.''